All articles
Andy Hewett
Andy Hewett · 7 min read
Design

8 Best Marker.io Alternatives Compared (2026 Guide)

Marker.io alternatives featured title image

The best Marker.io alternatives depend on what happens after a client leaves feedback. If you only need comments pinned to a live page, Pastel, Userback or BugHerd will do the job. If you run a web agency or freelance, Atarim is the AI web agency, plugged into yours: it does the client work under your brand, and client feedback is one of the ways that work comes in. Below, we compare 8 Marker.io alternatives for 2026.

Marker.io alternatives compared at a glance

ToolBest forFeedback on live websitesPricing
AtarimWeb agencies and freelancers who want the client work done under their brandYes$67/mo single plan, unlimited client seats
FilestageReviewing videos, PDFs and imagesFiles and media firstSee pricing page
UserbackFeedback from people using a web appYesFree plan, paid plans above
PastelSimple, fast client reviewsYesFree plan, paid plans above
BugHerdVisual bug tracking on client projectsYesFrom $50/mo ($42 billed yearly) for 5 members
RuttlSimple web design feedbackYesSee pricing page
Frame.ioVideo review and approvalNoSee pricing page
FeedbucketAgency client feedback with videoYesPaid plans, 14-day free trial

Based on each tool’s published features and plans as of October 2026. Plans change often, so check each pricing page before you decide.

Why agencies look for a Marker.io alternative

Marker.io is built for one job: turning website feedback into detailed bug reports that land in the tools developers already use, like Jira, Trello, Asana and GitHub. It does that well. Its AI turns rough notes into clear reports, writes titles and translates comments, and its MCP server lets an AI coding agent you run yourself pull a bug’s details and attempt a fix.

Agencies usually start looking elsewhere for three reasons:

  • Triage still lands on your team. Every client comment becomes a ticket someone has to inspect, reproduce, assign and fix.
  • It’s built for developers. The reports are detailed, which can feel technical for non-technical clients.
  • Seats and projects are capped by plan. Starter covers 3 seats and 1 project, so growing agencies move up a tier quickly.

1. Atarim: the AI web agency, plugged into yours

Atarim is the AI web agency, plugged into yours. Agency owners and freelancers point it at the client sites they look after, and it designs, writes, fixes and ships the work under their brand. Owners decide what runs on its own and what waits for them, and nothing reaches a client without their approval.

  • Best for: web agencies and freelancers who want every client looked after without hiring anyone.
  • The team: six specialists called the Inner Circle, covering design, copy, SEO, UX, QA and project management.
  • How client feedback fits in: clients can click any part of a page to ask for a change. The request lands as a task, the right specialist picks it up, and the fix comes back previewed for your approval.
  • Under your brand: clients only ever see your agency's name, and requests sent by email land in the Agency Inbox as tasks too.
  • Works with: any website through a shared link, web snippet or Chrome extension, plus a native WordPress plugin.
  • Pricing: paste a URL to see what your AI agency works out, with no account or card needed. $67 a month switches the team on.

2. Filestage: for multimedia reviews

Filestage is built for reviewing and approving files: videos, PDFs, images and documents. It suits creative and marketing teams that need sign-off on many formats, with approval workflows to keep reviews moving. It’s less suited to day-to-day website feedback and task management than the tools built around live pages.

Best for: teams whose reviews are mostly creative files rather than live websites.

3. Userback: for web app feedback

Userback collects visual feedback and bug reports through a widget on your site or web app, with screenshots, video and session replay on higher plans. Its AI Assist sorts feedback into bugs, ideas and questions, and an MCP connection lets AI tools work with your feedback.

Best for: product teams gathering feedback from people using their web app. Pricing: a free plan with two feedback projects (feedback is kept for seven days), with paid plans above that.

4. Pastel: for simple client reviews

Pastel is a lightweight way to collect comments on live websites. It’s quick to set up and easy for clients to understand, which makes it popular with freelancers and small teams.

Best for: designers and freelancers who want fast, simple client reviews. Pricing: a free plan for one user and one active project, with paid plans above that. Sending feedback to tools like Trello, Asana or Jira starts on the higher plans.

5. BugHerd: for visual bug tracking

BugHerd is one of the best-known visual feedback tools. Clients point, click and comment on a live site, and each comment becomes a task on a kanban board. Beta AI features suggest task titles and flag similar tasks, and BugHerd MCP lets your own AI coding tool read tasks and attempt fixes.

Best for: teams that want straightforward visual bug tracking. Pricing: Standard is $50/month ($42 billed yearly) for 5 members, up to Premium at $150/month ($125 billed yearly) for 25, with unlimited guests. See our full BugHerd alternatives comparison.

6. Ruttl: for web design feedback

Ruttl lets teams and clients leave feedback on live websites and streamlines the design review process. It works well for smaller web projects that need a clean review flow without much setup.

Best for: small web design projects and client review rounds.

7. Frame.io: for video projects

Frame.io is the go-to tool for video review, with frame-accurate comments and approvals for production teams. It doesn’t collect feedback on live websites, so it only replaces Marker.io if your reviews are mostly video.

Best for: agencies and teams producing video.

8. Feedbucket: for agency client feedback

Feedbucket adds a feedback button to a client’s website, so clients can send annotated screenshots and video straight from the page. It syncs feedback two ways with project management tools.

Best for: agencies that want client feedback synced into their existing project tools. Pricing: paid plans with a 14-day free trial, no card needed.

How to pick the right Marker.io alternative

  • You need something free: try Pastel or Userback.
  • Your developers live in Jira or GitHub: BugHerd will feel familiar.
  • Your reviews are mostly files or video: Filestage or Frame.io.
  • You run a web agency or freelance and want the client work done under your brand: Atarim, the AI web agency plugged into yours.

For a wider comparison, see our guide to the best website feedback tools for agencies, and before any launch run through our website QA checklist.

Marker.io alternatives FAQs

What is the best Marker.io alternative?

It depends on your team. For web agencies and freelancers, Atarim is the strongest pick because it's the AI web agency, plugged into yours: it does the client work under your brand, and nothing reaches a client without your approval. For visual bug tracking, BugHerd is a close match to Marker.io. For simple free reviews, Pastel and Userback are easy places to start.

How much does Marker.io cost?

Marker.io’s Starter plan is $39 a month billed yearly ($59 monthly) for 3 seats and 1 project. Team is $149 a month billed yearly ($199 monthly) for 15 seats and 3 projects, and Business is custom-priced. There’s no free plan, but every plan has a 15-day free trial.

Is there a free alternative to Marker.io?

Yes. Pastel has a free plan for one user and one active project, and Userback has a free plan with two feedback projects, though feedback is only kept for seven days. Both work on live websites, and both have paid plans when you need more.

Does Marker.io use AI?

Yes. Marker.io’s AI turns rough notes into clear bug reports, writes titles and translates comments. Its MCP server lets an AI coding agent you run yourself, like Claude Code or Cursor, pull a bug’s details and attempt a fix, often as a pull request for a developer to review.

How is Atarim different from Marker.io?

Marker.io collects feedback and sends detailed bug reports to developer tools. Atarim is the AI web agency, plugged into yours: six specialists design, write, fix and ship the client work under your brand, and client feedback is one of the ways that work comes in. Owners decide what runs on its own and what waits for them, and Atarim is a single $67 a month plan with unlimited client seats.

Andy Hewett
Written by
Andy Hewett

Andy Hewett is part of the team at Atarim, where he helps agencies get more out of the platform. He writes about client feedback, creative review and the everyday workflows that keep agency projects moving. His articles focus on practical ways to cut the back-and-forth and ship work faster.

Related reading

Put AI to work on your client sites.

Live on your first site in minutes, under your guardrails. No card needed.

Start Free Book a demo